Table 2. Operational situation

ASPa nASPb P Class P Overall
Special, 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
LEADERSHIP SUPPORT
Document 82 (84.5%) 93 (67.9%) 0.006 78 (91.8%) 67 (70.5%) 30 (55.6%) < 0.001 175 (74.8%)
Financial budget 24 (24.7%) 30 (21.9%) 0.725 29 (34.1%) 16 (16.8%) 9 (16.7%) 0.010 54 (23.1%)
ACCOUNTABILITY
Physician leader 62 (63.9%) 67 (48.9%) 0.032 66 (77.7%) 44 (46.3%) 19 (35.2%) < 0.001 129 (55.1%)
Pharmacist leader 83 (85.6%) 100 (73.0%) 0.032 74 (87.1%) 72 (75.8%) 37 (68.5%) 0.027 183 (78.2%)
Key support
Clinician 94 (96.9%) 115 (83.9%) 0.032 82 (96.5%) 85 (89.5%) 42 (77.8%) 0.032 209 (89.3%)
Pharmacist 91 (93.8%) 120 (87.6%) 0.176 74 (87.1%) 72 (75.8%) 37 (68.5%) 0.094 211 (90.2%)
ACTION TO SUPPORT OPTIMAL ANTIBIOTIC USE
Policies
Facility have a policy 79 (81.4%) 98 (71.5%) 0.113 75 (88.2%) 69 (72.6%) 33 (61.1%) 0.001 177 (75.6%)
Facility have facility- specific treatment recommendations 74 (76.3%) 93 (67.9%) 0.210 71 (94.7%) 66 (95.6%) 30 (90.9%) 0.027 167 (71.4%)
Broad interventions
Preauthorization for specific antibiotic agents 85 (87.6%) 108 (78.8%) 0.117 76 (89.4%) 83 (87.4%) 34 (62.9%) < 0.001 193 (82.5%)
Review courses of therapy for specified antibiotic agents 83 (85.6%) 117 (85.4%) 1.000 75 (88.2%) 85 (89.5% 40 (74.1%) 0.025 200 (85.5%)
Pharmacy-driven interventions
From IV to PO 89 (91.8%) 131 (95.6%) 0.343 82 (96.5%) 88 (92.6%) 50 (92.6%) 0.467 220 (94.0%)
Dose adjustments when organ dysfunction 90 (92.8%) 133 (97.1%) 0.208 82 (96.5%) 93 (97.9%) 48 (88.9%) 0.039 223 (95.3%)
Dose optimization 79 (81.4%) 94 (68.6%) 0.040 66 (77.6%) 71 (74.7%) 36 (66.7%) 0.347 173 (73.9%)
Automatic alerts when unnecessarily duplicative therapy 49 (50.5%) 79 (57.7%) 0.343 52 (61.2%) 46 (48.4%) 30 (55.6%) 0.227 128 (54.7%)
Diagnosis and infections specific interventions
Community-acquired pneumonia 42 (43.3%) 50 (36.5%) 0.361 44 (51.8%) 38 (40.0%) 10 (18.5%) < 0.001 92 (39.3%)
Urinary tract infection 40 (41.2%) 53 (38.7%) 0.797 45 (52.9%) 37 (38.9%) 11 (20.4%) 0.001 93 (39.7%)
Skin and soft tissue infections 47 (48.5%) 60 (43.8%) 0.568 51 (60.0%) 42 (44.2%) 14 (25.9%) < 0.001 107 (45.7%)
Surgical prophylaxis 56 (57.7%) 68 (49.6%) 0.276 53 (62.4%) 51 (53.7%) 20 (37.0%) 0.014 124 (53.0%)
Empiric treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 35 (36.1%) 41 (29.9%) 0.396 40(47.1%) 21 (22.1%) 15 (27.8%) 0.001 76 (32.5%)
Culture-proven invasive (e.g. blood stream) infections 41 (42.3%) 50 (36.5%) 0.450 46 (54.1%) 32 (33.7%) 13 (24.1%) 0.001 91 (38.9%)
TRACKING: MONITORING ANTIBIOTIC PRESCRIBING, USE AND RESISTANCE
Process measures
Monitor adherence to stewardship policy 79 (81.4%) 107 (78.1%) 0.646 67 (78.8%) 77 (81.0%) 42 (77.8%) 0.936 186 (79.5%)
Monitor adherence to facility-specific treatment recommendations 67 (69.1%) 90 (65.7%) 0.689 66 (77.6%) 57 (60.0%) 34 (62.9%) 0.032 157 (67.1%)
Antibiotic use and outcome measures
Track rates of Clostridioides difficile infection 28 (28.9%) 27 (19.7%) 0.141 29 (34.1%) 13 (13.7%) 13 (24.1%) 0.005 55 (23.5%)
Produce an antibiogram 50 (51.5%) 61 (44.5%) 0.354 63 (74.1%) 29 (30.5%) 19 (35.2%) < 0.001 111 (47.4%)
Monitor antibiotic use (consumption)
Antibiotic(s) administered to patients per day 53 (54.6%) 76 (55.5%) 1.000 54 (63.5%) 48 (50.5%) 27 (50.0%) 0.149 129 (55.1%)
Number of grams of antibiotics used 46 (47.4%) 65 (47.4%) 1.000 45 (52.9%) 45 (47.4%) 21 (38.9%) 0.270 111 (47.4%)
Direct expenditure for antibiotics 63 (64.9%) 71 (51.8%) 0.062 46 (54.1%) 60 (63.2%) 28 (51.9%) 0.311 134 (57.3%)
REPORTING INFORMATION TO STAFF ON IMPROVING ANTIBIOTIC USE AND RESISTANCE
Share facility-specific reports 67 (69.1%) 74 (54.0%) 0.029 57 (67.1%) 57 (60.0%) 27 (50.0%) 0.134 141 (60.3%)
Has a current antibiogram 60 (61.9%) 63 (46.0%) 0.024 60 (70.6%) 40 (42.1%) 23 (42.6%) < 0.001 123 (52.6%)
Prescribers receive direct, personalized communication 64 (66.0%) 77 (56.2%) 0.171 62 (72.9%) 53 (55.8%) 26 (48.1%) 0.007 141 (60.3%)
EDUCATION
Provide education 72 (74.2%) 87 (63.5%) 0.112 64 (75.3%) 63 (66.3%) 32 (59.3%) 0.129 159 (67.9%)
Participants involved in the ASP team
Participants uninvolved in the ASP team
Note: Number of “Yes” answers (Percentage of “Yes” answers)